Ram Janm bhoomi land of worship not the land of dispute

Ayodhya, land which is known as kingdom of Raja "Dashrath" which is mentioned in many hindu epics. Moreover history also confirm this reality that there is kingdom Ayodhya which is ruled by Raja dashrath who has 3 queens-consorts namely "Kaushalya,"Sumitra" and "Kaikeyi" from whom he has 4 boy child namely "Raam","Laxman","Bharat","Shatrughan". Among four raam is the elder son who is also known as image of lord Vishnu on earth. Hindu has great respect and religious belief for Raam as lord takes birth on earth. After dashrath Ram has taken the control of the Kingdom.

If the epic and history talked about the same and also talked about the Ayodhya kingdom so why such disturbance is taking place for the particular location. Why we are calling that land as "Land of Dispute", If every facts and history have the proof for the existence so why court is taking so much time to declare the land in favour of one community.

We all know very well that India is ruled by Mughals in 15th century where they have acquired most of the area in north, but kingdom ayodhya is well known from period before Christ (B.C) i.e 536 B.C. Every one know the truth that mughal king Babar is very cruel and is hampering all the ancient hindu monument while his rule. So if history and epics talked about the Ram mandir so why constitution is favouring the cruel king Babar. This issue has become communal now and we know handling communal issues will have total involvement of politics and it could also harm the silence maintained in Ayodhya but every community has to think about the religious belief of other. If land has been divided than accept the decision and start making your monuments what's the matter of violence?

Why lord Ram is struggling to be placed in his own kingdom. There is no myth and stories this is reality but have to give Agni Pariksha before justifying it. As Sita wife of Ram who has also given Agni Pariksha to prove her clean and right. Same truth is struggling on earth and will be justified only after testing it to go from fire. I personally think this issue should be resolve by mutual understanding because Ram is face of lord and we all are child of that god so there should not be much issue on one's own property. So i will request both the committee to sit on same ground and talk with mutual understanding without hampering each other.

Worship is the path of peace and happiness so don't make place dirty by violence 

Author: Aashish Mittal
BJP IT CELL

Juvenile Justice Bill passed yesterday in Rajya Sabha

Yesterday, One of the important bill (Juvenile Justice Bill) that is hanging has passed in Rajya Sabha but this bill is not able to give justice to Nirbhaya. So the happiness of having amendment in law of age for adult has not left much impact. Nirbhaya 3 years back brutally tourchered and raped by 6 monsters among those 6 one of the monster is below 18 so he is considered as juvenile which has made supreme court and every constitution entity handcuffed.

Nirbhaya, the name which is given when every Indian has raised his/her voice on the unbearable act done on delhi roads. India is united on this brutal incident and so many march has been done for demanding Justice for Nirbhaya. If there is some law or power in hand of supreme court to amend law for serious issues than today that one Juvenile monster should not be freed but now due to weak law and system that monster is out of jail and is helped by the government for establishing his own business. Delhi Chief Minister "Arvind Kejriwal" has given the cash money of 10 thousand along with one Tailor machine and shop to re-establish his life and start new journey. But if that monster can attempt such serious action in age less than 18 so what is guarantee that he will not do any crime after coming to age of 25 or plus.

This bill can't helped Nirbhaya but the girl has saved life of many other girls that could face same situation. Nirbhaya parents are happy that this bill get amended and the age of juvenile has reduced to 16. But the question again arises that why the age of 16-18 that are called children's are able to do such serious crimes, what there family doing are they not aware of the environment in which the child is growing if not then it is the high time parents have to think about this because there leniency can produce one criminal. Nirbhaya is no more but her pain is lived by each and every Indian. In my opinion any person adult or child should be seriously handled if he/she has done some serious crime.

After the new amendments we can hope that the crime rate among juveniles should decrease and parents need to be more serious of the environment in which there child is growing.

"Justice Today can save life in Future.."